The Application of Universal Jurisdiction in South Africa: A Study of National Courts’ Jurisdiction over International Crimes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67101/alamir.v7i01.287Keywords:
Universal Jurisdiction, International Criminal Law , South Africa, Genocide , Crimes against Humanity and War Crimes , Rome Statute ImplementationAbstract
Universal jurisdiction is a principle of international law that allows national courts to prosecute certain grave international crimes regardless of where they were committed or the nationality of the perpetrators or victims. South Africa, as a state committed to international criminal justice, has incorporated this principle into its domestic law through statutes like the Implementation of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court Act 27 of 2002 (“ICC Act”) and the Prevention and Combating of Torture of Persons Act 13 of 2013 (“Torture Act”). These laws empower South African courts to try perpetrators of genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and torture even if such crimes occurred outside South African territory. This article provides an academic analysis of how universal jurisdiction is codified and applied in South Africa, including a discussion of the main categories of international crimes, an examination of the country’s legislative framework, and an overview of major cases in particular the landmark Southern African Litigation Centre v National Director of Public Prosecutions (“Zimbabwe Torture Docket” case). The article further analyzes the legal, political, and practical challenges South Africa faces in implementing universal jurisdiction, such as issues of complementarity, immunities, diplomatic sensitivities, and the difficulty of investigating crimes committed abroad. It concludes that while South Africa’s courts and laws have laid a strong foundation for exercising universal jurisdiction over international crimes, significant challenges remain in turning legal principles into effective prosecutions, highlighting the tension between the country’s international obligations and political realities.
Views & Downloads Stats:
References
Stephen Macedo (ed), Universal Jurisdiction: National Courts and the Prosecution of Serious Crimes under International Law (University of Pennsylvania Press 2006).
Madume Kgosietsile, Protection Against Torture in International Law (University of South Africa 2015).
South African Litigation Centre v. National Director of Public Prosecutions, (2012) (10) BCLR 109 (GNP), ¶ 33 (S. Afr.).
M Cherif Bassiouni, ‘Universal Jurisdiction for International Crimes: Historical Perspectives and Contemporary Practice’ (2001) 42 Virginia Journal of International Law 81.
Kenneth C Randall, ‘Universal Jurisdiction under International Law’ (1987) 66 Texas Law Review 785.
Gerhard Kemp, ‘South Africa’s (Possible) Withdrawal from the ICC and the Future of the Criminalization and Prosecution of Crimes against Humanity, War Crimes and Genocide under Domestic Law: A Submission Informed by Historical, Normative and Policy Considerations’ (2017) 16 Washington University Global Studies Law Review 411.
Madume Kgosietsile, Protection Against Torture in International Law (University of South Africa 2015).
Christopher Soler, ‘Aut Dedere Aut Judicare’ in The Global Prosecution of Core Crimes under International Law (TMC Asser Press 2019) 319.
Nadya Sadat, ‘Redefining Universal Jurisdiction’ in The Globalization of International Law (Routledge 2017) 241.
Matthew Lippman, ‘The Drafting of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide’ (1985) 3 Boston University International Law Journal 1.
Gary D Solis, The Law of Armed Conflict: International Humanitarian Law in War (Cambridge University Press 2021).
Yuma Totani, The Tokyo War Crimes Trial: The Pursuit of Justice in the Wake of World War II (vol 299, Brill 2020).
Robert Donihi, ‘War Crimes’ (1992) 66 St John’s Law Review 733.
Darryl Robinson, ‘Defining “Crimes Against Humanity” at the Rome Conference’ (1999) 93 American Journal of International Law 43.
Nigel S Rodley, ‘The Definition(s) of Torture in International Law’ (2002) 55(1) Current Legal Problems 467.
Madume Kgosietsile, Protection Against Torture in International Law (University of South Africa 2015).
Oscar Nzabonimpa, ‘An Examination of the Law on the Jurisdiction of International Criminal Court and Its Applicability in Africa’ (PhD thesis, Kampala International University 2018).
Max du Plessis, ‘Bringing the International Criminal Court Home: The Implementation of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court Act 2002’ (2003) 16(1) South African Journal of Criminal Justice 1.
International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid (adopted 30 November 1973, entered into force 18 July 1976) UNTS vol 1015, p 243.
Neha Jain, ‘A Separate Law for Peacekeepers: The Clash Between the Security Council and the International Criminal Court’ (2005) 16(2) European Journal of International Law 239.
Buhle Angelo Dube, ‘Universal Jurisdiction in Respect of International Crimes: Theory and Practice in Africa’ (2015)
IBID.
Yana Shy Kraytman, ‘Universal Jurisdiction—Historical Roots and Modern Implications’ (2005) 2 BSIS Journal of International Studies 94.
Stefanie Bock, ‘The German Code of Crimes Against International Law at Twenty: Overview and Assessment of Modern “German International Criminal Law”’ (2023) 21(4) Journal of International Criminal Justice 793.
Dapo Akande, ‘International Law Immunities and the International Criminal Court’ (2004) 98(3) American Journal of International Law 407.
Antoine Manishimwe, ‘Immunities from Prosecution of International Crimes: A Critical Analysis of the Position of African Member States to Both the Rome Statute and the Malabo Protocol’ (PhD thesis, University of Rwanda 2019).
International Criminal Court, ‘ICC Issues a Warrant of Arrest for Omar Al-Bashir, President of Sudan’ (4 March 2009) https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/icc-issues-warrant-arrest-omar-al-bashir-president-sudan
accessed 18 November 2025.
Douglas C Youvan, ‘Challenges in Prosecuting Politically Powerful States for Genocide: A Comparative Analysis of ICC and ICJ Jurisprudence’ (2024).
Philippe MK Plagbe, ‘Investigating Pathways to Accountability for International Crimes in Africa: Comparative Review of Selected Justice Mechanisms’ (2023).
Manfred Nowak, Moritz Birk & Giuliana Monina (eds), The United Nations Convention Against Torture and its Optional Protocol: A Commentary (2nd ed, Oxford University Press 2019) ISBN 978-0198846178.
Ibid.
Christopher Gevers, ‘Southern Africa Litigation Centre & Another v National Director of Public Prosecutions & Others: Note’ (2013) 130(2) South African Law Journal 293.
Manuel J Ventura, ‘Zimbabwe Torture Allegations: The High Court of South Africa Invokes the Principle of Complementarity in Southern Africa Litigation Centre and Another v National Director of Public Prosecutions and Others’ (2012).
Gerhard Werle and Paul Christoph Bornkamm, ‘Torture in Zimbabwe Under Scrutiny in South Africa: The Judgment of the North Gauteng High Court in SALC v National Director of Public Prosecutions’ (2013) 11(3) Journal of International Criminal Justice 659.
Jamil Ddamulira Mujuzi, ‘Private Prosecutions in Mauritius: Clarifying Locus Standi and Making the Director of Public Prosecutions More Accountable’ (2017) 10(1) African Journal of Legal Studies 1.
Jonisayi Maromo, ‘SA ordered to prosecute Zim torture suspects’ Mail & Guardian (8 May 2012) https://www.mg.co.za/article/2012-05-08-sa-ordered-to-prosecute-zim-torture-suspects/ accessed 18 November 2025.
Southern Africa Litigation Centre & Another v National Director of Public Prosecutions & Others [2012] ZAGPPHC 99 (North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria) https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAGPPHC/2012/99.html accessed 18 November 2025.
Ibid.
Dire Tladi, ‘National Commissioner of the South African Police Service v Southern African Human Rights Litigation Centre (Sup Ct App S Afr)’ (2015) 54(1) International Legal Materials 152.
Riaan Eksteen, ‘South Africa—Constitutional Court and Supreme Court of Appeal’ in The Role of the Highest Courts of the United States of America and South Africa, and the European Court of Justice in Foreign Affairs (TMC Asser Press 2019) 285.
Nkosinathi Mzolo, ‘The Rule of Law, the Principle of Legality and the Test for Rationality: A Critical Analysis of the South African Jurisprudence in the Light of the Separation of Powers’ (PhD thesis, University of KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg 2016).
Dire Tladi and Martha Magdalena Bradley, ‘National Commissioner of the South African Police Service v Southern African Human Rights Litigation Centre and Another 2015 (1) SA 315 (CC)’ (2015).
Hendrik J van As and Philippus J Snijman, ‘Challenges and Possible Solutions Concerning the Inspection/Investigation Dichotomy in the Context of Transnational Organised Fisheries Crime: A South African Perspective’ (2019) 105 Marine Policy 140.
Saloni Khanderia, ‘The Prevalence of “Jurisdiction” in the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Civil and Commercial Judgments in India and South Africa: A Comparative Analysis’ (2021) 21(2) Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal 181.
IBID.
Philippe MK Plagbe, ‘Investigating Pathways to Accountability for International Crimes in Africa: Comparative Review of Selected Justice Mechanisms’ (2023).
National Commissioner of the South African Police Service v Southern African Human Rights Litigation Centre & Another [2014] ZACC 30 (CC) https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/2014/30.html accessed 18 November 2025.
Manuel J Ventura, ‘The Duty to Investigate Zimbabwe Crimes Against Humanity (Torture) Allegations: The Constitutional Court of South Africa Speaks on Universal Jurisdiction and the ICC Act’ (2015) 13(4) Journal of International Criminal Justice 861.
Henry A Kissinger, ‘The Pitfalls of Universal Jurisdiction’ (2001) 80 Foreign Affairs 86.
‘South Africa’s Involvement in Zimbabwe’s Suspension from the Commonwealth of Nations’ (2023) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379923548_South_Africa%27s_Involvement_in_Zimbabwe%27s_Suspension_from_the_Commonwealth_of_Nations accessed 18 November 2025.
Daglous Makumbe, ‘South Africa, the Rome Statute and the International Criminal Court: Implications for President Omar al-Bashir’s May 2015 Visit’.
Ibid.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bilal Hassan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
