A CRITICAL STUDY OF CLINTON BENNETT’S THOUGHTS TOWARDS SIRAH OF THE HOLY PROPHET ﷺ
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67101/alamir.v2i02.31Keywords:
Clinton Bennett, Prophet’s biography, Divergent traditions, Miracles, Salman Rushdie, Genuine ProphetAbstract
Sirah of the Holy Prophet ﷺ is the topic on which a lot of work has been done both in the Muslim and non-Muslim world. For Muslims it was the source of aspiration and adaptation for the practical purposes of social life while for the non-Muslims it was the source of inquisitiveness and understanding Islam as a successful religion in the past and present time. Therefore, Muslim enthusiastic interest in the biography of the Holy Prophet ﷺ developed and evolved into a regular science while the west has modified the knowledge of biography according to their own order of preference but within the same biographic precedents. Both have tried to reconstruct the biography of the Holy Prophet ﷺ historically, chronologically and logically.
Clinton Bennett is one of the western scholars who has contributed not only in the Islamic literature but also the biographic field. His work consists of numerous issues in Islam. Whatever he has learned from Islam and the Sirah of Holy Prophet and thus concluded in the form of his own thoughts, he has expressed most of them in his famous five books for example ‘In Search of Muhammad’, ‘Muslims and Modernity’, ‘Studying Islam’, ‘Interpreting the Qur’an’, and ‘Victorian Images of Islam’ (doctoral thesis)’.
This study focuses on Clinton Bennett’s work on Sirah specifically with his broader view of the subject. This research is descriptive and analytical in nature and presents a detailed analysis of the work it is based upon.
Views & Downloads Stats:
References
Clinton Bennett, Studying Islam: The Critical Issues (London: The Tower Building, 11 York Road, Continuum, 2010), p. 34.
Clinton Bennett, In Search of Muhammad (London: Cassell, Wellington House, 125 Strand, 1998), p. 18.
Al-Qurʾān, 9:36.
Bennett, In Search of Muhammad, p. 19.
Bennett, In Search of Muhammad, p. 40.
Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal, Al-Musnad (Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Risālah, 2001), Ḥadīth no. 20695.
Ibn Ḥanbal, Al-Musnad, Ḥadīth no. 20695.
Bennett, In Search of Muhammad, p. 40.
Bennett, In Search of Muhammad, p. 46.
Muḥammad ibn ʿĪsā al-Tirmidhī, Al-Sunan, 4:477, Ḥadīth no. 2182.
Muslim ibn al-Ḥajjāj, Al-Jāmiʿ al-Ṣaḥīḥ, 4:2159, Ḥadīth no. 2801.
Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl al-Bukhārī, Al-Jāmiʿ al-Ṣaḥīḥ, 4:206, Ḥadīth no. 3636.
Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl al-Bukhārī, Al-Jāmiʿ al-Ṣaḥīḥ, 2:80, Ḥadīth no. 1291.
Al-Qurʾān, 2:23.
Clinton Bennett, Interpreting the Qur’an: A Guide for the Uninitiated (London: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2010), p. 42.
Bennett, In Search of Muhammad, p. 64.
Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl al-Bukhārī, Al-Jāmiʿ al-Ṣaḥīḥ, Kitāb Manāqib al-Anṣār, Bāb Inshiqāq al-Qamar.
Al-Qurʾān, 2:23.
Bennett, Interpreting the Qur’an, p. 42.
Bennett, Interpreting the Qur’an, p. 94.
Gospel of John, 10:41.
Bennett, In Search of Muhammad, p. 49.
Bennett, In Search of Muhammad, p. 50.
Ahmad Shafa’at, “A Review of Clinton Bennett, In Search of Muhammad and In Search of Jesus,” accessed May 2002, Islamic Perspectives, p. 8.
Shafa’at, “A Review of Clinton Bennett,” p. 8.
Qamr-ul-Huda, “A Review of In Search of Muhammad,” Islamic Studies 39, no. 1 (2000): 141.
Bennett, In Search of Muhammad, p. 63.
Ahmad Shafa’at, “A Review of Clinton Bennett, In Search of Muhammad and In Search of Jesus,” Islamic Perspectives, accessed May 2002.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Abdul Hameed, Hafiz Muhammad Faisal Qureshi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
