Brotherhood between the Muhājirūn and the Anșār: Values, Principles, and Potential Benefits in the Age of Globalization
المؤاخاة بين المهاجرين والأنصار:القيم والمبادئ وإمكانية الاستفادة في عصر العولمة
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67101/alamir.v5i02.166Keywords:
Brotherhood, Muhajirun, Ansar, solidarity, contemporary applicationsAbstract
This article examines the concept of brotherhood (المؤاخاة) between the Muhajirun (emigrants) and the Ansar (helpers) during the early Islamic period, focusing on its principles, foundations, and contemporary applications. The brotherhood established by the Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وسلم) created a model of solidarity and social cohesion that remains relevant today.In the religious domain, these principles can enhance unity among Muslims by promoting shared values and organizing cultural and religious activities. Economically, the model advocates for justice and social equity through fair wealth distribution, zakat, and charitable initiatives, which can reduce economic disparities and support sustainable development. Scientifically, the principles of brotherhood encourage collaborative research and knowledge exchange. Establishing joint research centers and academic programs can elevate scientific and technological capabilities in Muslim countries, contributing to global progress. In facing globalization challenges, the brotherhood model offers solutions for preserving cultural and religious identities while promoting social and economic equity. It supports political and diplomatic cooperation to defend shared interests and achieve sustainable development.
In conclusion, the brotherhood between the Muhajirun and the Ansar provides timeless lessons in unity, justice, and cooperation, offering valuable insights for addressing modern challenges and fostering progress in various fields.
Views & Downloads Stats:
References
ʿAlī ibn Burhān al-Dīn al-Ḥalabī, Al-Sīrah al-Ḥalabiyyah (Beirut: Dār al-Maʿārifah, 1996), vol. 3, p. 220.
Ibn Hishām, Al-Sīrah al-Nabawiyyah (Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1996), p. 234.
Muḥammad ibn Saʿd, Al-Ṭabaqāt al-Kubrā (Beirut: Dār Ṣādir, 1968), p. 287.
Ismāʿīl ibn ʿUmar Ibn Kathīr, Al-Bidāyah wa al-Nihāyah (Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, 1997), p. 331.
ʿAbdullāh Yūsuf al-ʿAbd al-Qādir, Al-Muʾākhāh Bayn al-Muhājirīn wa al-Anṣār (Dammām: Dār Ibn al-Jawzī, 2010), p. 45.
Ibn Hishām, Al-Sīrah al-Nabawiyyah, vol. 1, p. 200.
Muḥammad ibn Jarīr al-Ṭabarī, Tārīkh al-Umam wa al-Mulūk (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 1987), pp. 145–150.
Al-Suhaylī, Al-Rawḍ al-Unuf fī Tafsīr al-Sīrah al-Nabawiyyah (Beirut: Dār al-Kitāb al-ʿArabī, 1992), vol. 2, p. 150.
ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Ḥabannakah al-Maydānī, Al-Muwāsāh fī al-Islām (Damascus: Dār al-Qalam, 1989), p. 120.
Muḥammad ibn ʿUmar al-Wāqidī, Kitāb al-Maghāzī (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 1989), p. 112.
ʿIzz al-Dīn ʿAlī ibn Muḥammad Ibn al-Athīr, Usd al-Ghābah fī Maʿrifat al-Ṣaḥābah (Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 2003), p. 243.
ʿAbdullāh al-Khuḍrī, Al-Taḥaddiyāt al-Muʿāṣirah wa al-ʿAwlamah: Ruʾyah Islāmiyyah (Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 2015), p. 231.
Aḥmad al-Zahrānī, Al-Takāful al-Ijtimāʿī fī al-Islām: Dirāsah Muqāranah (Beirut: Dār al-Nahḍah al-ʿArabiyyah, 2017), p. 317.
Muḥammad Sālim, Qiyām al-Muʾākhāh Bayn al-Muhājirīn wa al-Anṣār wa Taṭbīqātuhā al-Muʿāṣirah (Cairo: Dār al-Shurūq, 2018), p. 89.
Muḥammad ʿAbdullāh, Al-Iqtiṣād al-Islāmī: Mabādiʾuhū wa Ahdāfuhū (Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 2015), p. 150.
ʿAbdullāh al-Zahrānī, Durūs wa ʿIbar min al-Muʾākhāh Bayn al-Muhājirīn wa al-Anṣār (Jeddah: Dār al-Manārah, 2020), p. 145.
ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Kubaysī, Al-Nahḍah al-ʿIlmiyyah fī al-Islām (Beirut: Dār al-Nahḍah, 2012), p. 95.
Sālim, Qiyām al-Muʾākhāh Bayn al-Muhājirīn wa al-Anṣār wa Taṭbīqātuhā al-Muʿāṣirah, p. 95.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dr. Muhammad Zakir, Dr. Sami Ullah, Dr. Manzoor Ahmad

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

