Analytical Review of Modern Atheism in the Contemporary Era
عصرِ حاضر میں الحادِ جدید کی صورتوں کا تحلیلی جائزہ
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67101/alamir.v5i01.124Keywords:
Gnosticism, Agnosticism, Deism, Atheism, Theism, Secular, Modern EraAbstract
In the contemporary era, atheism has evolved, presenting new challenges and perspectives that significantly differ from traditional atheistic viewpoints. This article aims to conduct an analytical review of the various forms of modern atheism, exploring their origins, philosophies, and the factors contributing to their rise in the modern world. By delving into the sociopolitical, scientific, and philosophical landscapes that have fostered the growth of contemporary atheistic thought, this study seeks to understand the complexities and nuances of atheism today. The paper examines the impact of technological advancement, increased access to information, and the shifting paradigms of morality and ethics on the prevalence of atheism. Additionally, it explores how contemporary atheism interacts with religious beliefs, focusing on the dialogue and sometimes conflict between these differing worldviews. The analysis extends to the consequences of modern atheism on individuals and societies, considering both the emancipatory aspects and the existential challenges it poses.
Furthermore, the article engages with various responses to modern atheism, including theological rebuttals, apologetics, and the efforts by religious communities to address the questions and critiques raised by atheistic thought. By providing a comprehensive overview of the landscape of modern atheism, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of its significance in the contemporary era and the ongoing discourse between belief and disbelief.
Ultimately, this article seeks to offer a nuanced perspective on modern atheism, recognizing it as a multifaceted phenomenon that reflects broader changes in the global intellectual, cultural, and spiritual climate. Through this analytical review, the paper aims to facilitate a more informed and respectful dialogue between atheistic and theistic perspectives in the modern world.
Views & Downloads Stats:
References
Louis Maʿlūf, Al-Munjid (Karachi: Dār al-Ishāʿat, 1994), 914.
Simon Blackburn, Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy (London: Oxford University Press, 2008), 35.
Imām Rāghib al-Aṣfahānī, Mufradāt al-Qurʾān (Lahore: Al-Maktabah al-Qāsimiyyah, 1943), 315.
Muḥammad bin Muḥammad al-Zabīdī, Tāj al-ʿArūs (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-Mawrid, 1934), 2253.
Pīr Karam Shāh al-Azharī, Tafsīr Ḍiyāʾ al-Qurʾān (Lahore: Ḍiyāʾ al-Qurʾān Publications, 1965), 335.
Ḥāfiẓ Muḥammad Shāriq, Ilḥād aur Jadīd Zehn ke Sawālāt: Ilḥād Aik Taʿāruf (Lahore: Kitāb Mahal, 2017), 87.
Muḥammad Dīn, Ilḥād (Lahore: Kitāb Mahal, 2017), 36.
Answer to Atheists, Facebook Post.
Wikipedia Urdu, “Lā-Adriyat”.
Mubashir Nazīr, Ilḥād-e-Jadīd ke Maghribī aur Muslim Muʿāshroṅ par Athrāt (Karachi: Jāmiʿah Karachi, Dār al-Taḥqīq barāʾe ʿIlm o Dānish, 2014), 9.
Leland Royce Harper, “Attributes of a Deistic God,” in Multiverse Deism: Shifting Perspectives of God and the World (Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield, 2020), 47–68.
Gregory Claeys, “Revolution in Heaven: The Age of Reason (1794–95),” in Thomas Paine: Social and Political Thought, 1st ed. (New York and London: Routledge, 1989), 177–195.
Eric R. Schlereth, An Age of Infidels: The Politics of Religious Controversy in the Early United States (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013), 295.
AL Quran, 14:33.
Mirrat, Article No. 21.
Murray Thomas, God in the Classroom: Religion and America’s Public Schools (London: Praeger Westport, 2007), 10.
Muftī Anas Razā Qādrī, Dehriyat ka Taʿāruf o Tārīkh aur Dehriyoṅ ke Eʿtirāḍāt ke Jawābāt (Lahore: Al-Razā Qurʾān o Fiqh Academy, 2023), 30–33.
AL Quran, 2:129.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dr. Ghulam Farooq, Dr. Asma Aziz, Ms. Kinza Sajjad

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

